This blog is best viewed with the latest browser and an open mind!

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Reason takes a backseat again …

It would be ridiculous for me to even begin a post on this topic without requesting that you read xyz's brilliant and hilarious rant first.

(By the way, XYZ, that doesn't look quite like a pair of binoculars to me but suspiciously like a Theodolyte … And it may well be one with a crescent painted inside the lenscap that's put on whenever the government wants the mullas to announce the sighting :D
Of course, to XYZ's objections the faithful will retort and say the Qürãn demands that we see it with the naked eye. Ahaaaa ... but it says nothing, does it, about someone else seeing it with their naked eyes and informing us? But, then, we reason, how does a blind person see it? Obviously s/he relies on others? So there is a lacuna that actually allows us to think for ourselves, right? Hey, mullaas - did you ever notice that?
The Qürãn set a principle that, in those days, required a physical sighting … not a law that can't be modified to suit the current situation. Ohhh, so there are exceptions? Yes. Specially to what Mullas think are Divine Laws, rather than Godly Guidelines
Here's a case in point: The holy book also says that during Vüzoo (Vudhoo to the Pakistanis who have difficulty pronouncing Züaads - through a case not of cleft palates but of cleft brains) the faithful must wash both hands. So is the one-armed person exempt because hir circumstances have changed? Should s/he skip the ablution? Or skip prayers (since pre-requisites aren't complete)? I think all would agree that s/he is expected to pray after performing a one-handed ablution. Without even spraying water over a phantom limb, Dr. Ramachandran :~)
So, where does s/he get the right to do that? Hmmm.... Hasn't anyone heard of Reason?"
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use!" — Galileo
Nizaamé Aql, anyone?
OK, enough bickering. I shall let the Mullaas fight this out among themselves as they have done in the past. On particularly bad days I wish they'd just kill each other - and the last 24 hours have been particularly bad for me.
Let me move on to the raison d'être for this post: Sharing Syed Mohammad Jafri Sahab's account of the RHC's doings under its friend and master!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments:

Blogger self said...

I read Ramadan to you Arabophile slaves to the neo-Taliban herd and wondered why I should bother with the rest of the article.

23 August, 2009 14:29

 
Blogger Zakintosh said...

@self - that's xyz's article and you are free to protest or not read it ... but i still think you ought to read the nazm here and enjoy it :)

23 August, 2009 15:01

 
Blogger Sidhusaaheb said...

Ah! The glorious uncertainties of the game!

:D

23 August, 2009 15:22

 
Blogger Faisal.K said...

the RHC is incapable of even seeing each other at close distance hence we have deemed them moon sighters.

Same as a government who is unable to police itself is deemed powerful in the democratic sense and capable of policing its junta.
Grt nazam

25 August, 2009 17:27

 
Blogger self said...

Oh, I did read all of it, but I just didn't like the tone.

27 August, 2009 23:26

 

Post a Comment

<< Home